Details of Research Outputs

TitleComparison of building environment assessment systems across the belt and road countries: How do green buildings contribute to achieving ecological civilization and sustainable development goals?
Creator
Date Issued2018-11-30
Source PublicationSilk Road to Belt Road: Reinventing the Past and Shaping the Future
ISBN9789811329982;9789811329975;
Author/Editor of Source PublicationMd. Nazrul Islam
Publication PlaceSingapore
PublisherSpringer
Pages235-258
Abstract

Humans have long been inhabiting in two different worlds, the natural environment and the world of artifact. Since the early 1950s, there has been a steady increase in urban population. As of 2016, 54% of the world population lives at urban areas, whereas in China, the percentage of urbanization has exceeded 57%. Since urban people spend a significant amount of time indoors (i.e., in buildings), together with the possible environmental impacts of a building during its construction, operation and maintenance as well as destruction, building design significantly influences its environmental impacts and human wellbeing, consequently, various Building Environment Assessment Systems (BEASs) have been developed to give guidance and standard for making green buildings. Among the countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), at least five BEASs have been commonly utilized: BREEAM (UK), LEED (USA), DGNB (Germany), BEAM Plus (Hong Kong SAR, China), and GB/T 50378 (Mainland China). Due to more frequent cultural and institutional interactions across the BRI participated countries, it can be foreseen that professional collaboration on infrastructure and new building construction will be further strengthened. This paper attempts to compare these BEASs based on their assessment categories, criteria and weightings in new public building design. Furthermore, this paper will evaluate the contributions of green building on the China’s establishment of ecological civilization as well as United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals. The role of Hong Kong SAR (China) as a “super-connector” and its significance in assisting China enterprises to go global in the platform of Belt and Road Initiative will also be discussed.

Language英语English
DOI10.1007/978-981-13-2998-2_14
URLView source
Scopus ID2-s2.0-85063928084
Citation statistics
Cited Times [WOS]:0   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document TypeBook chapter
Identifierhttp://repository.uic.edu.cn/handle/39GCC9TT/6280
CollectionFaculty of Science and Technology
Affiliation
1.United International College, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
2.ARUP International Consultants (Shanghai) Co Ltd, Shanghai, China
3.Environmental Science Programme, United International College, Zhuhai, China
4.Whole Person Education Office, United International College, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
First Author AffilicationBeijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Tsim, Siu Tai,Su, Sherry Yue,Yuen, Bonny Bun Hoet al. Comparison of building environment assessment systems across the belt and road countries: How do green buildings contribute to achieving ecological civilization and sustainable development goals?. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 235-258.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Usage statistics
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Tsim, Siu Tai]'s Articles
[Su, Sherry Yue]'s Articles
[Yuen, Bonny Bun Ho]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Tsim, Siu Tai]'s Articles
[Su, Sherry Yue]'s Articles
[Yuen, Bonny Bun Ho]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Tsim, Siu Tai]'s Articles
[Su, Sherry Yue]'s Articles
[Yuen, Bonny Bun Ho]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.